Understanding the Controversy:

The three new criminal laws, which came into effect on July 1, 2024, have significant implications for India’s legal framework. They were drafted following extensive deliberations and passed after due process in Parliament. However, Chidambaram’s comments implying a lack of professionalism and expertise among those involved in drafting these laws have drawn sharp criticism from Vice-President Dhankhar and others who view such remarks as undermining the sanctity of parliamentary procedures.
Total
0
Shares

New Criminal Laws

In a recent development, Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar criticized former Finance Minister P Chidambaram for his disparaging remarks on the new criminal laws passed by Parliament in December 2023. Dhankhar, without explicitly naming Chidambaram, expressed dismay over the comments made by the Rajya Sabha MP, labeling them as “derogatory, defamatory, and highly insulting.” The remarks in question, where Chidambaram referred to the drafters of these laws as “part-timers” and “non-professional people,” have sparked a heated debate on the credibility and competence behind legislative processes in India.

The three new criminal laws, which came into effect on July 1, 2024, have significant implications for India’s legal framework. They were drafted following extensive deliberations and passed after due process in Parliament. However, Chidambaram’s comments implying a lack of professionalism and expertise among those involved in drafting these laws have drawn sharp criticism from Vice-President Dhankhar and others who view such remarks as undermining the sanctity of parliamentary procedures.

Vice-President Dhankhar’s Response

Addressing the issue at the 12th convocation of the Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology (IIST) in Thiruvananthapuram, Dhankhar condemned the remarks made by Chidambaram, emphasizing the importance of respecting Parliament’s decisions and the competence of lawmakers involved in legislative processes. He highlighted that such comments not only disrespect the wisdom of Parliament but also reflect poorly on the democratic institutions of the country.

Chidambaram’s Perspective

In his interview with The Indian Express, Chidambaram critiqued the composition of the committee that drafted these laws, suggesting that its members lacked the necessary full-time commitment and professional expertise required for such crucial legislative tasks. While his intention may have been to critique the process, the choice of words has sparked a contentious debate over the professionalism and dedication of lawmakers and experts involved in legislative drafting.

Implications and Public Reaction

The public reaction to this controversy has been mixed. While some support Chidambaram’s right to critique legislative processes, others echo Vice-President Dhankhar’s sentiments, emphasizing the need for respectful discourse and constructive criticism in matters of national importance. The debate has also highlighted broader concerns about transparency, accountability, and expertise in legislative drafting, issues that resonate deeply within India’s democratic framework.

The clash between Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar and former Finance Minister P Chidambaram over the new criminal laws underscores the complexities and challenges inherent in legislative processes. While criticism and debate are integral to democracy, the manner and language used in such discourse are equally crucial. As India navigates through these discussions, it remains imperative to uphold the integrity of parliamentary institutions and foster an environment conducive to informed and respectful debate on matters impacting the nation’s legal and social fabric.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 + twelve =

You May Also Like
Dr. Anjali Nimbalkar

“The Role of Anganwadi, Asha and Mid-Day Meal Workers in Women’s Empowerment”

On 30th April, 2023, the Congress party organized a public event at the Malaprabhara ground in Khanapur, where party leader Priyanka Gandhi addressed the public on various issues related to Anganwadi, Asha, and mid-day meal workers. Dr. Anjali Nimbalkar, a prominent Congress leader, welcomed Priyanka Gandhi and presented her with a Buddha statue made by a local artist, Mr. Pundalik Kumbhar.
View Post
Dr. Anjali Nimbalkar

BJP’s politics of division and the need for a Congress-led development in Karnataka

During his address, Chavan criticized the BJP’s politics of division, which he argued was aimed at creating chaos in the name of religion and caste. He noted that the BJP had defamed the word ‘development’ and that people were not ready to name their children ‘Vikas’ anymore. Chavan argued that one who works for public welfare does not have to rely on caste and religion, and that the BJP had forgotten the issues of the people.
View Post